Politic<span id="more-4277"></span>s and Gambling 2015: Match Made in Heaven or Arranged Marriage?

Politics and gambling were front and center in the 2015 landscape. Hillary Clinton is the favourite to end up being the Democrat nominee for the 2016 election that is presidential and her stance on gaming continues to be a bit murky.

Politics and gambling are quite similar in theory. Both involve strategizing and calculating, using odds under consideration, and determining just how to proceed in the best interest of one’s self.

When it comes to politicians addressing the presssing issue of gambling, this issue becomes a bit more complicated. Lawmakers understand that casinos bring the chance of increased tax revenues that translate to extra monies that could fund state governments that are currently struggling in order to make ends meet.

Republicans and Democrats seldom agree with anything in today’s divisive political climate, and when it comes to gambling, these hardened foes aren’t exactly yes where to face. Perhaps because online gaming, in particular, is neither liberal nor conservative, but a bit of each, there isn’t any cut that is clear, regardless of your party or standpoint.

With all that in head,we take a look straight back on this year that is past battles with politics and gambling, and what seems to lie ahead in 2016.

The Race for 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue

It’s shaping up to be Hillary Clinton versus the still-uncertain GOP nominee next November. Whether it’s Donald Trump, Dr. Ben Carson, Florida Senator Marco Rubio or another Republican candidate, a very important factor is almost for certain, and that’s Clinton will be their opponent.

Hillary Clinton

Hillary’s past when it comes to gambling is a bag that is rather mixed. Then-New York Senator Clinton voted in favor of this Internet that is unlawful Gambling Act (UIGEA) of 2006, a bill that essentially made online betting illegal.

But, 2 yrs later on, Clinton said she was at favor of investigating exactly how online gambling can be properly regulated. The front that is democratic hasn’t addressed the growing concerns of daily dream sports (DFS) as of yet.

Donald Trump

The surprising GOP leader is unsurprisingly perhaps gambling’s bet that is best for expansion of casinos, both land-based and online. As a former casino owner himself, the Donald probably will do little or nothing to block any federal legislation that could restrict states’ rights from deciding their own gaming rules.

Marco Rubio

Rubio has issued rather contrasting views on gambling. The senator that is first-term the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA) in 2015, a bill that would outlaw all types of online gambling.

However, he also hinted this that RAWA might need an amendment for Internet poker, since it has elements of skill, but he’s remained steadfast against expanding gambling at land-based venues october.

Dr. Ben Carson

The previous Johns Hopkins neurosurgeon has remained quiet regarding the dilemma of gambling, and since he does not have any political or background that is gambling his record is vacant.

Speaker Paul Ryan

Though House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wisconsin) isn’t an advocate for gambling or online casinos, he isn’t necessarily against the marketplace. The nine-term congressman opted not to vote on UIGEA in 2006 and in addition opted for not to sign RAWA despite the fact that 21 of his Republican peers did.

The main one concern with Ryan among gambling supporters is the fact that he’s employed Dave Hoppe as his chief of staff. Hoppe is a Washington, DC, lobbyist who’s got worked on behalf of billionaire Sheldon Adelson.

Sheldon’s Crusade

No man ended up being more active in 2015 gambling that is political than billionaire and long-time GOP supporter Sheldon Adelson. The Las Vegas Sands president is no stranger to politics or Congress, and definitely knows what the expression ‘money talks’ is all about.

Worth approximately $30 billion, Sheldon’s made it his individual mission to ban online gambling enterprises through the use of his political clout among GOP lawmakers to push RAWA in the Senate and House of Representatives.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) and Senator Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) obliged and introduced the bill to their particular chambers, though it’s generated little action. Don’t expect RAWA to magically soon disappear anytime, the billionaire saying he’ll spend ‘whatever it will take’ to end Internet gambling. But it doesn’t appear to be threatening the shutdown of the three legal states, either.

club player casino sign in

2016 will be an important year maybe not just due to the impending presidential election, but in part due to the rise of day-to-day fantasy contests. The return of PokerStars to nj-new jersey may also bring added attention to online gaming.

RAWA in 2015: The Long and Winding path That Led to Confusion and Contention

Year billionaire Sheldon Adelson is funding the RAWA journey, and though the legislation idled in 2015, the excursion will continue after the New. (Image: politico.com)

RAWA endured a lengthy 2015 campaign in which the legislation that aims to block all forms of online gambling failed to gain much momentum in Congress, despite several lawmakers advocating on its behalf.

Formally known as the Restoration of America’s Wire Act, RAWA was initially introduced in the Senate and House of Representatives in March of 2014 by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) and Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah).

The bill was largely overshadowed in Washington, DC, during its initial introduction as elected leaders inside the Beltway were focused on the so-called ‘cromnibus,’ a head-scratching emergency bill that fundamentally funded the government that is american 2015.

Graham and Chaffetz reportedly attempted to slide RAWA into the cromnibus package, but the bill eventually passed free of any gambling legislation.

RAWA’s defeat in 2014 did not hamper its proponents’ inspiration for this present year’s legislative calendar. Supported by billionaire Sheldon Adelson, the $30 billion nevada Sands owner who desperately wants online casinos outlawed, Graham and Chaffetz when once again introduced the proposal for their chambers.

Chaffetz’s Hearing Help

Carrying out a February presentation of RAWA, Chaffetz used his looking at the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations to carry a formal hearing on the professionals and cons of giving Internet betting into prohibition.

The committee invited five witnesses to testify, but it absolutely was evident right away the majority was at benefit of RAWA. University of Illinois Law Professor John Kindt even stole a relative line directly from Adelson when he stated, ‘Click your phone, lose your house … click your mouse, lose your household.’

Exactly What little coverage the RAWA hearing received was rather negative, media pundits identifying the bias among the invitees. That led to Chaffetz ultimately failing to gain much help from his home colleagues, RAWA basically being shelved within the aftermath.

Graham’s Bad Timing

Timing is everything, and Graham’s decision to re-enter RAWA in to the Senate came at what was perhaps the most ill-advised time the sc politician may have chosen.

On the day before nine victims of the Charleston, sc, shooting were set to rest, Graham quietly reintroduced RAWA.

Poker Players Alliance Executive Director John Pappas condemned the action saying, ‘we think we speak for most Americans when I express profound dissatisfaction in Senator Graham for selecting this time to advance a bill for the only real good thing about a billionaire political donor.’

Graham’s bill has sat quietly ever since, attracting more dust into the halls associated with the US Capitol than White House china that is fourth-tier.

The DFS Factor

RAWA is thought to have predominantly struggled in 2014 and much of the previous 12 months because the subject of online gambling simply was not relevant enough for middle-of-the-road politicians to tackle. But that might have changed now, thanks to fantasy that is daily (DFS).

DFS has already been outlawed by Nevada and brand New York, and numerous other states are currently thinking the legality of the contests. Should Congress intervene, that could theoretically open the floodgates for additional anti-online gaming regulations.

In Memorium, Almost

Finally, both a House Oversight and Government Reform (OGR) meeting on Dec. 9th and a failure (once again) to include RAWA in a end-of-year spending bill ensures that RAWA may live to see another day in 2016, but most likely it’s going to be gasping for breath and on a heart-lung machine that is adelson-funded.

The 2015 On Line Gambling State-by-State Review: Lots of Talk, Not Much Action

On line gambling was once again a topic that is active state and federal lawmakers, so that as the discourse continues, billionaire Sheldon Adelson continues his efforts to fight it off. (Image: Jeff Scheid/Las Vegas Review-Journal)

Online gambling earned plenty of floor time in state capitols in the united states’s 50 states in 2015.

The movement ended up being fueled by a select few whom believe legalizing Internet betting could provide substantial revenue increases for state jobs while also protecting citizens and adolescents from accessing rogue offshore sites. These legislators then persuaded colleagues to open an ear.

On the other hand of the issue was effective nevada casino billionaire Sheldon Adelson funding political action committees and pressuring federal lawmakers to stop the growing market.

The dubious subject of ending prohibition that is online 47 of the 50 states ended up being often discussed, but never made it out of the park. Here is a state-by-state recap of exactly what happened over the final 12 months.

Who Did Just What

California: The Golden State would provide a boost that is beneficial on-line poker and online gambling, but America’s most populated state idled regarding its passage in 2015. Several bills were introduced, nonetheless a battlefield that is complicated lawmakers, Native Americans, and racetracks led to deadlock.

Pennsylvania: The Keystone State appears poised to become the 4th state with legalized iGambling in 2016. Led by State Rep. John Payne (R-District 106), the Republican-controlled legislature might be required to legalize in purchase to combat Democrat Governor Tom Wolf’s increased investing.

Texas: The sun seems to be rising regarding gambling that is online the state for which poker’s most popular game was named. In late October, the Texas lottery reached out to Delaware for more information about its market. Congressman Joe Barton (R) is definitely in support of legalizing iPoker, and it seems to be momentum that is gaining.

Massachussetts: No state did more regarding gambling at land-based casinos in 2015 than Massachusetts. The Plainridge Park Casino opened in June, as well as the MGM Springfield and Wynn Everett are under construction. But on the web gambling stays a no-go for now.

New Hampshire: In April, state lawmakers heavily shot down yet another bill to authorize land-based casinos. iPoker fans in the ‘Live Free or Die’ state have little to be stoked up about, charitable poker games even drawing scrutiny in 2015.

Wisconsin: Badgers will continue waiting to try out poker outside a Wisconsin judge upholding hawaii’s poker ban by citing a 1964 ruling.

Michigan: The Spartan State has a history that is long of gambling, but that is not the way it is with online casinos. A Michigan State University study discovered that the state would benefit from legalizing the industry, but lawmakers have been weary to proceed.

Nevada and Delaware: Two states that legalized online gaming before 2015, Nevada and Delaware attempted to breathe life into their struggling iPoker systems by formally establishing an interstate lightweight. The pact hasn’t solved the problems of player liquidity as hoped, however.

Florida: The Sunshine State is definitely targeted by commercial casino operators for its population that is high of, but elected leaders have repeatedly knocked down efforts to lessen the monopoly on gaming native tribes have. Online gambling appears to be an even longer shot for passage.

New Jersey: The only other state with Nevada and Delaware to provide legal and regulated online gaming, New Jersey has its market placed for a monstrous 2016 after it granted PokerStars an operating license in late September. The Garden State is also attempting to legalize traditional sports betting, a lawsuit set to be heard in February of next year.

Brand New York: The Empire State was operating towards its authorization that is own of gambling in 2015 until daily fantasy sports (DFS) exploded. With multiple bills presented, all gaming legislation took a back seat once New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman pushed to make DFS unlawful in his state. Which brings us to…